(if anyone has an example of a difficult client send me the deatils and I'll post it....(change the names / places etc so you dont get shot!)
Now mine
I'll give you a condensed version
Principal is a shipowner and we have a small contract. But alas I really represent the charterer because that is where the power is (eventhough the shipowner is paying my commission).
The shipowners is doing very well from this contract but the charterer is asking for some flexibility that is technically out of the scope of the contract. There are production issues and the charterer needs some laycans to be adjusted.
The shipowner in question can sometime be a bit shortsighted and does not like to change anything from the original contract - even if the changes are not necessarily bad. He just doesn't like change. So we have been going back and forward, with raised voices, and the often reminder that he is paying my commissions...
Eventually things got sorted, and sure enough all is ok but THIS client always gets his pound of flesh.
I also win because he realises that this is a great paying client and that the charterer has my trust. The shipowner is paying my commissions BUT this charterer always chooses which broker to use - ME! WAHOO!!!!!!.
That's actually a very interesting point............who pays commissions? The shipowner or the charterer? The answer is not always as straightforward as it appears on the surface.
Stick around and I'll explain in another post